Being Gay and Elderly in Toronto

jibe to Peter Sprigg, author of Gay Marriage Questions, there ar devil reasons a civil spousal relationship should nary(prenominal) be granted for ethereal braces. One is that since they argon relationships and non hy menealss, they should non be granted. Sprigg says that in order to arrive a coupling, there mustiness be a pith of a macrocosm and a woman, non a man and a man.Traditional communication can non production place with two workforce involved. The second peerless is that these type relationships atomic number 18 harmful. They do not pass on the said(prenominal) benefits as a pairing between a man and a woman, and their consequences are far much negative than positive. (www.no animated matrimony. com/ homosexualmarriagequestions. hypertext markup language) Either way, its pick uped at, even up with the endorse standing alone, it is enough to not accept the charter that gay copulates should be able to soundly marry. The first stemma is that m arriage is an institution that predates the law and the Constitution. Marriage is sociological, not legal. Laws relating to marriage just detect and keep in tact an institution that is already in existence. However, some(a) people believe that marriage is a way of recognizing couples who are in love with each other. With that being said, they want to spend the rest of their lives together.Consider this. agree to Sprigg, love and companionship were sufficient to define marriage, then there would be no reason to deny marriage to unions of a squirt and an adult, or an adult child and his aging parent, or to roommates who suck in no cozy relationship. Most people think that the sexual element is what defines a marriage. However, marriage is so much more than that. According to Webster, marriage is a joint relationship between husband and wife the institution whereby men and women are joined in a special kind of social and legal dependence for the use of founding and maintaining a family.Anthropologist Kingsley Davis says that marriage is the unique mark of what is commonly called marriage is social recognition and approvalof a couples engaging in sexual intercourse and bearing and raising children. The question was raised, are married couples without children really in a marriage? If gay couples are denied to marry, shouldnt straight couples without children be denied also? According to what Sprigg had to say concerning marriage and children, this would make sense, would it not? Not necessarily.If a couple wants children, and for some reason cannot have them, it is not their fault. A couple who decides not to have children may change their minds. At any rate, childless marriages are still acknowledged because if not, it would be an invasion of a heterosexual couples solitude to require that they show intent to bear children, or the ability to have children. So, what is the real project of marriage? Anthropologist Kingsley Davis says that a marriages pu rpose is to socially recognized and approved to engage in sexual intercourse and bear and rear children.Another marriage scholar, Maggie Gallagher says that marriage across societies is a familiar sexual union that creates kinship obligations and sharing of resources between men, women, and the children their sexual union may produce. The mere biological conception and birth of children are not enough to make sure that reproduction of a healthy and favored society. Paul Nathanson, the homosexual scholar says that there are at to the lowest degree five functions that marriage servesthings that every culture must do in order to survive and thrive. They are 1. Foster the joining between men and women 2.Foster the birth and rearing of children 3. Foster some form of healthy manful identity 4. Foster the bonding between men and children 5. Foster the fault of adolescents into sexually responsible adults Maggie Gallagher puts it more simply, saying that children need stupefys and f athers and marriage is the closely practical way to get them for children. Actually, when you look at it, homosexuals already have the correctly the right to marry just like anyone else. When applying for marriage licenses, the drill does not ask for a persons sexual orientation. Now, the exemption of homosexuals to marry is other story.Their marriage, just as any marriage stipulates that any person is legally sanctioned from marrying a child, a close strain relative, a person who is already married, or a person of the same sex. Just because homosexuals have a desire to marry, does not make it right or legal anymore than the desires of other tiny (but less point-blank ) minorities of Americans gives them a right to pedophilic marriages, incestuous marriages, or polygamous marriages. Some tonus that prohibiting same sex marriages is just as discriminatory as miscellaneous marriages. However, that is not valid thinking.The purpose of the law against interracial marriage was t o nourish the social system of racial segregation, not to protect the nature of marriage. Preserving racial purity was an unworthy goal, certainly not one of the fundamental purposes of marriage common to all human civilizations. One of the arguments against gays is the fact that theology is not pleased with that union. According to the Bible, Men should not be lovers of themselves and neither should women. If deity said it, then, that settles it. Among all the sins mentioned in the Bible, perhaps none is more afoul(ip) to God than that of oddity.God destroyed two cities in the plains of Jordan, called Sodom and Gomorrah, because their wickedness was great (Genesis 1310-13). The English word, sodomy is a derivative of the word Sodom for the cities were full of the sins of sodomy. Now, with that in mind, how many times are people arrested for sodomizing young children or sodomizing other man? If one can get arrested for sodomizing, then evidently, it would stand to reason, that homosexuality is not right Biblically or lawfully. God created exaltation and Eve, not Adam and Steve. If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.They shall surely be put to finale and their blood shall be upon them. (Leviticus 2013). Homosexuality is not a sickness that is inherited or a disease from birth. Homosexuality is a wise(p) behavior, much like lying, stealing, fornication, etc. Those that learn and practice such must stop. 1 Corinthians 69 says, Do you not know that the sinful go out not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolater, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. The homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God. They must bring forth fruits worthy of repentance. Now, the purpose of this paper is to argue whether or not same sex marriages should take plac e in Toronto or anyplace else. Though the Bible or theology is not in question here, there is still the argument of whether gays should be legally married? The scripture clearly states, that this union should not be sanctioned. Consider this. It is not a sin for the color of ones skin to be white, red, yellow, or lack, and we shouldnt discriminate against another(prenominal) because of it. However, it is a sin to be a homosexual.It is not a consequence of discrimination. It is a matter of right or wrong in the grass of Almighty God. Some say homosexuals are natural that way and cannot change. This is another effort of men trying to justify themselves while practicing homosexuality. Homosexuality is condemned from the get-go of time to the end. One of these days, we will have to stand before God and give an account of what was we do to our bodies, smoking, homosexuality, illegal drugs, etc. In Nova-Scotia, two men were married, but they were told, that they could not receive com munion, unless they were celibate.These two men, both 69 are now trying to make the decision whether to leave the Catholic Church because now, they must make a choice between their religion and their marriage. They were refused, because Communion wafers are considered the body and blood of Christ. To Catholics, receiving communion is one of the organized religions nearly sacred rituals. Additionally, they were told that their marriage was a public scandal. umpteen people wonder why defending marriages and defending the family require polar views regarding same-sex unions. In other words, how can a homosexual marriage actuate a heterosexual marriage?Well, homosexuals unions often have a more direct impact on heterosexual marriages than we know. For instance, the Boston Globe inform June 29, 2003, that nearly 40 percent of the 5,700 homosexual couples who have entered into civil unions in Vermont have had a previous heterosexual marriage. Children are the ones who suffer the we ll-nigh of homosexual unions because these children grow up without a mother and a father. These children are also products of heterosexual marriages that ended up in divorce or death. These children also face being ridiculed at school and among their peers.The question is will these children, after being exposed to homosexuality in the home, grow up to be gay, or does this help them to choose heterosexuality vs. homosexuality? How do the mothers of these children feel about their now gay ex-husband, having custody or mishap rights? Some would approve it, and some would not. In Toronto, June 30, 2006, (LifeSiteNews. com) The mainstream media brought to life the phantom of the gay gene theory7 in covering a Canadian aim on the origin of homosexuality. Homosexuality influenced by biological factors, Canadian researcher says, title the CBC, the first to break the story.This study was regarding sexual orientation of men find out before birth. However, the study was most intriguing for what the mainstream media failed to cover. Namely that, if true, the study suggests that homosexuality is a congenital abnormality, and shares its origins with other disorders developed in the womb. (www. lifesite. net/ldn/2006/jun/06063003. html Westen, arse Henry, 2006) Some researchers at Brock University in St. Catherines Ontario published a study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences entitle Biological versus non biological fourth-year brothers and mens sexual orientation.The results of this study proved that same-sex sexual orientation is a result from having older brothers, even though the brothers may have not been raised together. To put it simpler, by way of explanation the researchers suggest that same sex relationships result from an repellent reaction of the mother to the male child in her womb. A theory of male homosexuality is consistent with the present finding that maternal immune response to succeeding male pregnancies, says the st udy.If in fact, this study is correct, then the connect between the mothers immune reaction and the childs future sexual orientation would probably be some establish of maternal anti-male antibodies on the sexual differentiation of the brain. Dr. John Shea, medical consultant to Campaign Life Coalition, explained to LifeSiteNews. com that the study explains the significance of its findings suggesting that the immune response of the mothers body, damages the sexual differentiation of the brain of the male child in the womb, thus producing an abnormality in the fetus. In 1998, almost 3. 7 million Canadians were 65 years of age and older. Over the next cardinal years, this number is expected to grow to approximately 5. 9 million. However, it is impossible to make out how many lesbians and gay men live in Canada. However, the numbers of older gay adults are estimated between 296,000 and 370,000, and should incr4ase proportionately to the general older race of the country to betwe en 471,000 and 590,000 people.(Newsletter of the centre for Applied Social research capability of Social Work, University of Toronto, Vol. no. 2/Fall/Winter, 2002). Gerontological research has begun to look at the issues pertaining to gay and lesbian seniors only in the late 1970s, and most of these studies in the area have not succeeded in the experience of gay aging from the viewpoint of women, ethnocultural minorities, low-income individuals, and chose not actively involved in the gay and lesbian communities. (Ibid, 2002)In summary, if all studies conducted on whether or not gay marriage should be sanctioned y the church in regard to marriage, the evidence shows and proves that homosexual couples, male or female should not be sanctioned because of the following reasons 1. An abomination in the eyesight of God 2. In these relationships, the marriage cannot be sanctioned because no union really took place. 3. Children, cannot be born of these marriages, unless they were brought in from a heterosexual marriage.One of the purposes of marriage is to have children. 4. Foster the bond between many women, and a list of other reasons mentioned above. References (www. nogaymarriage. com/gaymarriagequestions. html (Leviticus 2013, King James Version of Holy Bible) (www. lifesite. net/ldn/2006/jun/06063003. html Westen, John Henry, 2006) (Newsletter of the centre for Applied Social research Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Vol. no. 2/Fall/Winter, 2002).